Every law firm runs on workflows, whether or not anyone has written them down. A matter opens, tasks get assigned, documents get produced, deadlines get met, files get closed. Workflow management tools make that sequence explicit and move it forward automatically, so the work depends on the system rather than on someone remembering.
The difficulty is that “workflow management tool” describes at least four different kinds of software, and the best one for your firm depends entirely on which problem you are solving. A firm drowning in matter-opening admin needs something different from one that wants a litigation dashboard, which needs something different again from one whose real bottleneck is chasing clients for onboarding documents.
This guide sorts the category, names the leading tools in each, and — because it is one of the most searched aspects — covers dashboards and the free options honestly. It is written for practice managers, legal operations leads, and partners deciding where to invest. It is UK-focused, though several of the leading tools are international.
A note on who wrote this. This guide is published by OnBoardNow, which makes client onboarding software with built-in identity verification for regulated UK firms. That addresses one specific workflow — the client onboarding one — not the whole category, and we have an interest in it, which we have stated. Where another kind of tool is what your firm needs, we say so. Read every vendor-published guide with that question in mind, this one included.
The Four Kinds of Workflow Tool
Sorting the category is the most useful thing this guide can do, because most mis-buying comes from confusing these four.
| Kind | What it does | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Workflow inside practice management | Automates tasks and steps within your case management system | Firms wanting workflow where the matters already live |
| Standalone workflow / automation platform | Builds custom automated processes across tools | Firms with distinctive processes or many systems to connect |
| Dashboards and matter analytics | Visualises status, workload and deadlines across matters | Firms whose problem is visibility, not task routing |
| Specialist workflow (e.g. onboarding) | Deeply automates one high-value process | Firms with one painful, repetitive, compliance-heavy process |
The single most useful diagnostic question: is your problem that work does not move (tasks stall, steps get missed), that you cannot see what is happening (no visibility across matters), or that one specific process is painful (usually onboarding or a document-heavy sequence)? Those three problems point to three different kinds of tool, and buying the wrong one is the most common and expensive mistake in this category.
Workflow Inside Your Practice Management System
For most UK firms, the first place to look for workflow automation is the practice management system they already have. Clio, LEAP, Osprey Approach and Access Legal all include workflow features — task templates, automated assignments, reminders, and matter-type-specific processes.
The advantage is obvious: the workflow lives where the matters live, so there is no integration to build and no data to sync. The limitation is that the workflow is only as configurable as the platform allows, and some are more flexible than others. Before buying a separate tool, the honest first step is to establish whether your existing system’s workflow capability is genuinely inadequate or simply unconfigured — firms frequently buy additional software to do something their current system already does, unused.
Bloomberg Law and Thomson Reuters offer workflow capabilities aimed more at larger firms and matters spanning research, drafting and matter management, integrating workflow with their broader legal content and research ecosystems. These suit firms already invested in those platforms.
Standalone Workflow and Automation Platforms
When a firm has a genuinely distinctive process, or needs to connect several systems that do not talk to each other, a standalone automation platform earns its place.
General-purpose automation tools such as Microsoft Power Automate (bundled with many Microsoft 365 licences) and Zapier connect systems and move data between them. They are flexible and inexpensive, and for straightforward connections — notify a team when a form is submitted, copy data from one system to another — they are often all a firm needs. Their limitation is that they carry no legal-specific compliance logic and no audit trail a regulator would recognise, so they are right for admin automation and wrong for regulated client due diligence.
Legal-specific workflow platforms sit between these and practice management, offering configurable process automation with more legal awareness than a general tool. Streamline and similar products target this space. The trade-off is cost and the integration work to connect them to your system of record.
Dashboards and Matter Analytics
A significant share of searches in this space — law dashboards, litigation dashboards, Bloomberg legal dashboards — are really about visibility rather than automation. The problem being solved is not that work does not move, but that nobody can see across matters to know what is happening.
Dashboards visualise status, workload, deadlines and financials across a caseload. Most UK practice management systems include reporting and dashboard capability, and for many firms that built-in reporting is sufficient once configured. Bloomberg Law offers litigation and matter dashboards aimed at larger firms and in-house teams, integrated with its legal research and analytics — these are powerful but priced and pitched for the larger end of the market, and often bundled with research subscriptions rather than sold as standalone dashboards.
The honest guidance: before buying a dashboard tool, exhaust your existing system’s reporting. A dashboard on top of a system you already own, properly configured, beats a second system that needs its own data feed. And a dashboard is a diagnostic tool, not a fix — it shows you where matters stall, but something else has to unstall them.
Specialist Workflow: The Onboarding Case
This is where our commercial interest sits, so weigh it accordingly — but the argument is a general one about when a specialist tool beats a general one.
Sometimes a single process is painful enough, repetitive enough, and consequential enough to justify a tool built specifically for it rather than a general workflow platform configured to approximate it. In UK law firms, client and matter onboarding is the clearest example: it is repetitive, it is where files stall waiting for client documents, and it is the most heavily inspected part of the firm’s compliance under the Money Laundering Regulations 2017.
The SRA’s Anti-Money Laundering Annual Report 2024–25 found a third of inspected firms non-compliant and 54% partially compliant across 5,873 files reviewed, with failures concentrated in client and matter risk assessments and source of funds. A general workflow tool can route the tasks of onboarding, but it cannot verify an identity to a fraud-resistant standard, screen against sanctions and PEP lists, or produce the audit trail the regulator expects. Those require a tool built for the job.
The general principle: use your practice management workflow for routine internal processes, a general automation platform for connecting systems, and a specialist tool only where one process is painful and consequential enough to deserve it. Onboarding usually qualifies; most other processes do not.
Best Workflow Tools by Need
Rather than a single ranking — which would be meaningless across four different kinds of tool — here is what leads for each need.
| Your need | Look at | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Workflow where matters already live | Clio, LEAP, Osprey, Access Legal | Built-in workflow; no integration needed |
| Enterprise workflow across research and matters | Bloomberg Law, Thomson Reuters | Integrated with legal content and analytics |
| Connecting systems / custom automation | Power Automate, Zapier | Flexible, low cost; no legal compliance logic |
| Legal-aware standalone workflow | Streamline and similar | More legal awareness than general tools |
| Matter visibility and dashboards | Your PMS reporting first; Bloomberg for enterprise | Exhaust built-in reporting before buying |
| Onboarding and compliance workflow | OnBoardNow and specialist onboarding tools | Verification and audit trail a general tool can’t provide |
Free Workflow Tools for Law Firms
“Best workflow management tools for law firms free” is a common search, and the answer is more useful than a simple yes or no.
Genuinely free or near-free options exist for some needs. Microsoft Power Automate is bundled with many Microsoft 365 business licences a firm already pays for, and handles a surprising amount of admin automation — notifications, approvals, simple data transfers — at no additional cost. Zapier and similar tools have free tiers sufficient for low-volume connections. General project tools such as Trello, Asana and Notion have free tiers that can hold a matter checklist or a simple task board.
What free tools cannot do is the regulated, legal-specific work: client due diligence, identity verification, AML screening, or producing an audit trail to a regulatory standard. Those depend on licensed data and specialist compliance logic that carry a cost. A firm can automate a great deal of its internal admin for free; it cannot meet its MLR 2017 obligations for free, and attempting to is a false economy given the enforcement position.
The sensible approach: use free tools (especially Power Automate, which you may already own) for internal admin automation, and reserve paid tools for the workflows where compliance, integration depth or audit trails matter.
How to Choose
Questions ordered by how much they narrow the field.
- Which of the four kinds do you actually need — task automation, system connection, visibility, or a specialist process?
- Does your existing practice management system already do this, unconfigured? Check before buying anything.
- For regulated processes, does the tool provide compliance logic and an audit trail, or just task routing?
- Does it integrate with your system of record, or create a data island?
- For dashboards: have you exhausted your PMS’s built-in reporting?
- What is the true cost at your size, including any you already own (Power Automate)?
- Who configures and maintains it after launch — is that person named?
- Can you speak to reference firms of your size using it for the same need?
Common Mistakes
Buying workflow software your PMS already includes. Firms routinely purchase a second tool to do what their current system does unconfigured. Check first.
Confusing visibility with automation. A dashboard shows you where work stalls; it does not move it. If the problem is stalled work, a dashboard diagnoses but does not cure.
Using a general tool for regulated work. Power Automate and Zapier are excellent for admin and wrong for client due diligence — no compliance logic, no regulator-grade audit trail.
Buying a specialist tool for a non-painful process. Specialist tools earn their cost only where one process is genuinely painful and consequential. Onboarding usually qualifies; most processes do not.
Ignoring who owns it afterwards. An automated workflow needs a human owner or it drifts as the firm changes. Name that person before launch.
Overlooking what you already own. Many firms pay for Microsoft 365 and never use Power Automate. Free capability you already have beats a new subscription.
Future Trends
AI woven into workflow. Workflow tools are adding AI to draft, summarise and flag within automated processes. Expect this to become standard — with the same caution as elsewhere: assistive, human-reviewed, not autonomous on consequential steps.
Compliance workflows as a distinct category. The regulatory pressure on onboarding and AML is pushing compliance-specific workflow tools to separate from general ones, because the audit and evidence requirements are different.
Dashboards becoming predictive. Matter analytics is moving from showing what happened to flagging what is about to stall, though the useful versions keep a human deciding what to do about it.
Consolidation at the front door. Onboarding, verification and matter opening are converging into one workflow, which is drawing specialist onboarding tools closer to the core systems they feed.
More from tools firms already own. As Power Automate and similar mature inside Microsoft 365, the free-capability baseline rises, and the bar for buying a separate general automation tool gets higher.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the best workflow management tools for law firms?
It depends on which of four needs you have. For workflow where your matters already live, the built-in tools in Clio, LEAP, Osprey Approach and Access Legal are the first place to look. For connecting systems or custom automation, Microsoft Power Automate and Zapier. For enterprise workflow across research and matters, Bloomberg Law and Thomson Reuters. For a specific painful process like client onboarding and compliance, a specialist tool such as OnBoardNow. There is no single best tool across all four needs — identify your need first.
Are there free workflow management tools for law firms?
Yes, for some needs. Microsoft Power Automate is bundled with many Microsoft 365 licences firms already pay for and handles a lot of internal admin automation at no extra cost. Zapier and general project tools like Trello and Asana have free tiers for simple task and process management. What free tools cannot do is regulated legal work — client due diligence, identity verification, AML screening, or a regulator-grade audit trail — because those depend on licensed data and compliance logic that carry a cost. Use free tools for admin; use paid tools where compliance and integration matter.
What is a legal or litigation dashboard?
A legal or litigation dashboard visualises the status of matters across a caseload — deadlines, workload, stage, and financials — so a firm can see at a glance what is happening without opening each file. Litigation dashboards add contentious-work specifics such as hearing dates and disclosure status. Most UK practice management systems include dashboard and reporting capability; Bloomberg Law offers more advanced dashboards aimed at larger firms and in-house teams, often alongside its research subscription. Before buying a separate dashboard tool, it is usually worth fully configuring the reporting your current system already provides.
What is Bloomberg Law used for?
Bloomberg Law is a legal research and analytics platform used mainly by larger firms and in-house legal teams. It combines legal research, news, and workflow and dashboard tools, with analytics across dockets, matters and litigation. It is a subscription research service at heart, with workflow and dashboard capabilities built around that, and is generally pitched and priced for the larger end of the market rather than small high-street firms. UK firms comparing legal research subscriptions typically weigh it against LexisNexis and Westlaw.
Should I use my practice management system’s workflow or a separate tool?
Start with your practice management system. Clio, LEAP, Osprey and Access all include workflow features that many firms never fully configure, then buy a separate tool to do the same thing. Establish whether your existing capability is genuinely inadequate or simply unused first. Move to a separate tool only when you have a distinctive process the platform cannot model, a need to connect several systems, or a specific high-value process — like onboarding and compliance — that deserves specialist software with an audit trail your PMS does not provide.
Conclusion
The best workflow management tool for a law firm is the one that matches the problem you actually have — and there are four different problems hiding under one search term. Work that does not move points to task automation, ideally within the system you already own. Systems that do not talk point to a general automation tool, often one you already pay for. A lack of visibility points to dashboards, usually your existing reporting configured properly. And one painful, consequential process points to a specialist tool.
Two principles save most of the money wasted in this category. First, check what you already own before buying — both your practice management system’s unused workflow and the Power Automate licence bundled with Microsoft 365. Second, match the tool to the stakes: general tools for admin, specialist tools with audit trails for the regulated processes where getting it wrong is expensive.
For most UK firms, the one process that reliably justifies specialist workflow is client onboarding — because it is repetitive, it stalls files, and it is the part of the firm the regulator inspects most closely. Automate the routine internally, and reserve specialist investment for the workflow where compliance and evidence actually matter.
About OnBoardNow
OnBoardNow is client onboarding software with built-in identity verification, built for regulated UK firms. It is a specialist workflow tool for one high-value process — client and matter onboarding — automating the sequence from first contact to a verified, compliant client, and integrating with the practice management systems that run the rest of the firm.
The platform runs structured onboarding flows for each scenario. A secure link is sent to the client by email, text or WhatsApp — no account or login required on their side. The client completes a case-specific interview, uploads documents, and verifies their identity through the OnBoardNow mobile app using passport or driving licence capture with biometric liveness checking. AML, KYC, PEP and sanctions checks are automated into a single report alongside the verified identity. Interview responses populate forms such as Client Care Letters, TA6 and TA10 without re-keying, and the firm tracks progress in real time.
Outputs return structured and referenced — delivered directly into the correct case file for integrated systems including Clio, LEAP and Access/DPS/Eclipse, or in a fully organised format where no integration exists. A custom API is available, and firms without an integration can trigger onboarding by email.
Alongside law firms, OnBoardNow serves accountants, financial advisers, estate agents, letting agents and recruitment agencies. It is based in Goffs Oak, Hertfordshire. To see the platform or discuss requirements, visit onboardnow.
Leave a Reply